All Rights Reserved © 2008 (revised 2012) Thomas
W. Day
I have a theory, born from personal experience and
lightweight observation of history. My theory is that as a technology
approaches terminal, it gets really good. Then it dies. When a new
technology is just finding its legs, the technology being replaced makes a
wonderful collection of giant leaps; which will fail to stave off obsolescence,
even for a moment. But examining those last moments of declining
technological health can be really enlightening.
I'm not saying this as someone who has been on the leading
edge of a technology shift. In fact, as a mid-tech transient I've been
trailing edge for most of my life. In the mid-1980's, professional analog
audio recording gear began to be displaced by digital recording systems.
The last generation of analog recorders were a huge improvement over anything
previous technology. But it was too late: the convenience, cost advantage,
signal-to-noise improvement, and trendy-ness of digital wiped out those last
moments of glory and hardly anyone even noticed that most of the problems
usually associated with recording on analog tape had been minimized.
Today, professional analog recording systems are practically relics and even the
simplest personal computer has more editing and playback horsepower than a
multi-million-dollar studio from twenty years ago. In my lifetime, I've seen (or
am seeing) electronic tubes, analog computers, magnetic data storage,
photographic film, visual artist's tools, payphones, cathode ray tubes, analog
television, vinyl records and turntables, carburetors, and dual-shock motorcycle
suspensions quickly peak and begin the rapid transition from regular use to
museums' shelves
[2]
.
I was first turned on to this realization when I was a very
young man. When my kids were toddlers, one of our favorite weekend trips
was to Minden, Nebraska to visit the Harold Warp Pioneer Village Museum.
The place is stuffed with all kinds of historic tools and toys, from Pony
Express relics to railroad history to farm equipment to early internal
combustion vehicles. The thing that tripped my trigger was getting a close look
at horse-drawn carriages, especially the high-end, luxury models from the turn
of the last century. Just as the first internal combustion vehicles were
making horse-drawn transportation obsolete, the last carriages were becoming
efficient, comfortable, and sophisticated. I studied suspension systems
that we wouldn't see on cars until fifty years later. Some of these
vehicles had heating systems, evaporation interior cooling, clever convertible
tops, interior and exterior lighting, safety equipment, and finish work that
made the next half-century of car design look primitive. Unfortunately,
they also had horses providing the horsepower.
The other sign of impending obsolescence is
nostalgia. This country is currently being decorated with monuments to the
Golden Days of Oil. To anyone with a sense of history, that ought to be a
big, red, flashing sign that something is on the downhill slide. Folks are
paying idiotic prices for Gulf, Esso, Kerr-McGee, and Standard Oil memorabilia.
Oil Century Museums are popping up everywhere from California to Tex-ahoma to
Florida to New Jersey. Ohio is home to the "Society for Commercial
Archaeology." And, of course, we have wads of motorcycle museums littering
the country side. On my last long Midwestern bike trip, I counted ads for
half-dozen Harley/Indian museums before they began to fade into the fast food,
antique store, and hotel signs. The last couple of decades witnessed a giant
blast of the past as Boomers tried to revive their youth with muscle cars and
1950s-styled big twins. That fad won't last much longer, because Boomers
are soon going to be looking for their next hipster thing in prosthetic hips
(like mine) and electric wheelchairs.
Watching what's going on in our culture makes me suspect
that we're about to see our beloved internal combustion engine technology
vanish. I don't know if you've noticed, but internal combustion engines
have become trailing-edge technology, almost overnight. There are
alternative transportation systems on our highways and all over the rest of the
world. At the same time the technology designed into internal
combustion-powered cars and, especially, motorcycles has become absolutely
incredible. The performance, reliability, and even the sound of modern
motorcycles has been tweaked to the nth degree. The only thing that's been
stubbornly ignored is energy efficiency and that's probably the only
characteristic that really matters in the twenty-first century.
In end-or-year issue, the relatively conservative Motorcycle
Consumer News published their "Performance Index" for the current generation of
motorcycles. In a summary, they listed the following most important performance
categories: ten best 1/4 mile times, ten best rear-wheel HP, ten best
power-to-weight rations, ten best top speeds, ten best rear-wheel torque, and
ten best 60-0 stops. All but one of those measurements are, essentially, the
same sort of 1950's information; power.
Most likely, the only modern statistic included in the data
provided would be "average fuel mileage." By this standard, the 2006 Kawasaki
Ninja 650R was the winner at 65.3mpg (the 2007 version was 10mpg less fuel
efficient), followed by the Ninja 500 (64mpg), and Honda's Rebel 250 (62.6mpg).
The Victory 8-Ball at 29.8mpg was the fuel guzzling loser. My daughter's 1991
Geo got better mileage than more than half of the motorcycles MCN rated. From
occasional long ride experiences with folks on liter sportbikes, my own
calculations estimate that MCN was optimistic about the efficiency of most of
the bikes they rated. I wouldn't be surprised at less than 20mpg performance
from many of those street legal race bikes. (The new Honda NC700X has upped the game a bit, but I think it's too little, too late.)
While those performance-based qualities are being
fine-tuned, the world's oil consumption has rapidly passed world oil production.
Sometime in the last five years, oil demand whipped around oil production
capacity and the world's economies will either shift away from burning petroleum
or suffer the consequences. Some experts claim that 2005 was the whipping
point; the last year of "cheap oil" and that we're on the downhill slide where
production will get further from meeting demand every year.[1]
In 1999, the uber-conservative, alternative-technology-spurning oilman Dick
Cheney was one of those "experts" warning that the age of oil is about done.
Cheney told other oil execs, back then, that the reason oil companies weren't
building new refining plants was that investment would be putting good money
after bad. We have more than enough oil processing equipment, we don't
have much oil left to process. Some folks estimate that in as little as
two or three years, it may cost $100 to fill a compact car's tank. Filling
a bike's tank will be pretty close to half that and it's going to be more
expensive every year afterwards.
Let's get real. A 250hp, liter bike that burns 15-20
mpg is going to be a pretty worthless piece of history when gas costs four to
ten times what it costs today. Everything we use, do, and consume, will be
incredibly more expensive when oil bumps against the predicted 2025 $400 per
barrel. If we humans are lucky and put some planning and a lot of
resources into the next few years, we might be converting to hydrogen cell
vehicles or some other petroleum-less fuel about the time the old technology
becomes impractical. I like to imagine that motorcycles, with their
inherent energy efficiency and other advantages will be part of that change.
I'm sure horse lovers hoped horses would find a place in the modern
transportation scheme, back in 1906. Who knows, maybe horses will make a
comeback?
Personally, I'm feeling a little nostalgic today,
while the majority of Americans appear to be clueless about the future of our
energy-dependent systems. As an example, the dim-bulbs in St. Paul are
widening freeways, planning communities that are further than ever from
necessary services and employment, and designing government buildings that
depend on energy systems that will be disappearing about the time those
facilities are put into service. My sentiments, inspired by that
irresponsible bureaucratic inattention to reality, is considerably less upbeat.
Their behavior is more evidence that we always get the government we deserve,
just like every other country in the world.
While there appears to be a fair amount of thought going into replacing the
power plant under the hoods of our cars, for a while it looked like that
wouldn't be happening for two-wheeled vehicles. Zero Motorcycles and
Brammo have changed all that. Zero Motorcycle's new Z-Forcetm
power pack is pushing electric motorcycle technology fast into the new Green
Age. With a 100 mile range, an 88mph top speed, and 3,000 charge cycles (a
300,000 mile battery life), Zero's bikes are beginning to warrant their price
premium. Hayes' diesel-powered bike is another cool thing. A
hydrogen-powered turbo sportbike would be beyond hip.
Knowing that this oil barrel is more than half-empty with a
rust hole in the bottom has forced me to suspect that the world I lived in is
vanishing. I'm trying not to sound like a reformed whore, but it's hard
for me to pretend to any other pose. I am from a generation that burned
gas for almost nothing but recreational uses. I can "brag" that I
sometimes rode my Kawasaki Bighorn, Rickman 125 ISDT, or even the Harley Sprint
to the racetrack, took off the street hardware, raced the bike, and, after
reinstalling lights and crap, rode back home. I guess that's something.
But I also trailered, trucked, and station-wagoned bikes to races, took long
mind-altering rides in the country, and practiced racing on all sorts of
surfaces. Today, those leisurely rides through the country side feel a bit
like immature, excessive exercises in selfishness; and I'm missing them before
I've given up doing them. I know that every drop of oil that I waste is
coming out of my children and grandchildren's heritage and I'm becoming more
than a little ashamed of the oil I wasted before I knew better. The days
of getting together with a few dozen friends to explore backroads and hang out
in the twisties are fading. I think sports like motocross, road racing,
and all of the fun we have had aimlessly and recreationally burning fuel are
also coming to a sooner-than-you-think end. Between declining resources
and world-wide pollution and global heating catastrophes, it appears that we
have hung on to these carbon-burning handlebars a little too long.
I'm not celebrating this. I'm not gloating
or saying "I told you so" while I write this. I lived in a gloriously
ignorant, greedy, selfish time and it was an incredibly fun period in human
history. I wish I could pass it on to my children and, especially, my
grandson. If we're truly a civilization worth saving, we'll find a way to
make a world our kids can enjoy. If we don't, we deserve any misery we
receive.
[1]
A depressing, but complete site for all sorts of links to information about
the coming energy crisis is
http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net/.
[2] Paul Young added this note to my list of vanishing technologies from my own lifetime: "One of the guys I work with had his 11 year old son come up to him and ask 'Have you ever heard of something called a landline?' Something else to add to your list of disappearing technology. "
[2] Paul Young added this note to my list of vanishing technologies from my own lifetime: "One of the guys I work with had his 11 year old son come up to him and ask 'Have you ever heard of something called a landline?' Something else to add to your list of disappearing technology. "
8 comments:
Why don't we get it? This is an excellent essay. What will it take for folks to understand the real impact of their current lifestyle?
Most likely, a complete and total crash of the oil-based economic system, would be my guess.
So true, and resonant.
And thanks for not including banjos and bagpipes.
Really awful things like "banjos and bagpipes" never seem to go away.
If that counts, I average 86 MPG on the motor technology from the 80s with recent EFI addition.
I'd like to hear more about that.
It’s the bike you had featured on your blog: http://www.fuelly.com/driver/theug/tu250x Basically, 80s bike (GN series) with newer, and simpler, top end (two valves instead of four) and EFI in place of carburettor. I do drive it smoothly, avoiding rapid acceleration, unless necessary, less brakes and other hypermiling techniques. Obviously, in winter it drops off, but average is pretty reliable. I missed only one fuel up in the above log in year and a half.
No surprise at all. I've loved the TU since we first started using it for the MSF classes in Minnesota. Now I want one. Maybe it will replace my V-Strom.
Post a Comment