data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/492fd/492fd277fe7b83461b069a8bdb41032c74bea832" alt=""
After we reassembled our interior stereotypes, we actually had a conversation that resulted in Troy's complaining that nobody who read the magazine ever bothered to write in with either agreement or complete disgust about anything published in the magazine. I offered to write an article that I guaranteed would create response. They offered to publish it for a nominal fee if it was any good. That article ended with "We’re, on average, a freakin’ nation of posers and squids and we aren’t worth the effort it takes to run an EPA test." The next few weeks, Troy and Erin fielded more letters to the editor than they had received "in the history of the magazine." I've been a columnist for MMM since that first brief October 1999 shot across the bow of what passes for motorcycle journalism and community.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04fbd/04fbda129d4e497d7fbb20880d6c37f232d8d597" alt=""
When I showed this guy's picture to my wife, she said the guy who did the welding for a theme park project she designed 20-some years ago looked just like him. I looked at the early assembly of that stuff and mentioned to the project manager that they might want to hire an independent welding inspector before the frames were covered up with fiberglass artwork. I wouldn't trust my kids to something that guy had welded. I've known a few great welders and they were all as personally meticulous as they were professionally picky. If it looks like a slob, acts like a slob, and sounds like a slob, I'd assume it is a slob in all areas of life. Her "welder" was just another shop guy who'd fooled some ignorant management moron into believing he could weld "good enough."
On the other hand, I know several brilliant musicians, a few genius college professors (physics, sociology, electrical and mechanical engineering, philosophy, music, and neurology PhD's and MS's), more than a few technicians and engineers (mechanical, alternative energy, and electrical engineering), and a couple lawyers who have all of the above biker's physical and sartorial attributes except for the excess lard (although I know a brilliant Colorado lawyer who could wrap himself in that biker's "gear" without much discomfort). The problem with stereotypes is that they don't allow you to pick out the one-in-some-large-number exceptions. The reason we naturally create stereotypes ("profiles") is because they are more often than not accurate. They save us time, energy, and create some safe margin of distance from people who are often dangerous or useless.
One of my favorite recreation-reading authors, Minnesota-ex-patriot John (Camp) Sandford, is pretty typical in his "civilian" outlook on motorcyclists. In his newest book, Mad River, Sandford has one of his state cop main characters', Lucas Davenport, thinking about where you look to find criminals: "Davenport had spent the best part of two years building a database of people in Minnesota who . . . knew a lot of bad people. He had a theory that every town of any size would have bars, restaurants, biker shops, what he called 'nodes' that would attract the local assholes."In a list of three places in all of society where you might find the worst criminals "biker shops" makes the grade. Something for all of us to be proud of? Pound your chest and whine "that's not fair, we're not all assholes" as much as you like, but you know Sandford is just writing what everyone is thinking. By "everyone," I'm including us, even we think most bikers are assholes.
4 comments:
I've been lucky. I started riding out in western Massachusetts, where very few of the "traditional" motorcycle stupidity applies. Guys on BMWs wave to guys on Harleys, who wave to dirt bikers, and almost everyone waves to (or at least returns a wave from) and is willing to share a parking space with someone on a 50cc scooter. So my internal stereotypes don't really fit the norm.
On the other hand, something like 90% (I tracked it for a year or so, and did the math) of the reported accidents in the region involve someone under 25 on a sportbike, so that stereotype is alive and doing well...
I have only been riding for about 3 years and ride a Maxi-scoot. I generally agree and find a lot of posers out there - people with 30K invested in their bikes but with under 5K on it.
My scooter gets 15K a year or more. I've found a small group of riders that have traded in their cars. Who ride in all types of weather. Who ride all year round.
I'm stereotyping I know but give me the group that is riding every day, everywhere. I don't give a damn what you ride, as long as your actually riding.
If you check out our growing database (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqCkvq460Nn-dGppd0loNHQ0MjhacTU1QkJOMWJOV2c#gid=0), you'll see that 15k/year puts you in rarefied territory; as in almost by yourself. The overwhelming majority of "riders" rarely ride at all and when they do they too often fit the worst of our stereotypes: loud, obnoxious, punks, gangbangers, hooligans, antisocial, rude, and/or incompetent.
I'm not advocating being any of those things, but I'm saying if the majority view doesn't change a lot of things are going to change for us, including access to public roads.
After reading this article, how could one stereotype the author as one who dislikes Harley riders and might even go as far as thinking Harley motorcycles are not good bikes - whatever that mean.....no stereotypical author here.
Post a Comment